| |
Macroeconomic and Development Policies
It is nowadays widely accepted that a stability oriented macroeconomic policy
is a necessary condition for development and for achieving and sustaining high
levels of development. There is, however, less agreement on the focus, intensity
and sequencing of these stability-oriented policies: for example, while most
would put the target of low inflation first, others would accept a degree of
flexibility in public finances in order to cope with recessions or structural
change. It seems that the stabilisation policies proposed by the Bretton Woods
institutions have often not met with success and sometimes even worsened the
economic conditions of developing countries. At present, these policies are
being reoriented on the poverty reduction target. In this context, EMPANALYSIS
work will analyse the rationale behind an integration of "employment
goals" in the PRSP process, and the necessary macroeconomic policies
required in order to achieve this goal. The design and advocacy of
employment-focussed macroeconomic policies is a core element of the Global
Employment Agenda.
While EMP/ANALYSIS has not the means to engage in a full scale
country-by-country screening of the most adequate macroeconomic policies for
promoting the ILO's goal of employment and decent work, it will contribute to
this debate through cross-country analysis, and look into questions like the
room for manoeuvre in national macroeconomic policy in developing countries, the
avoidance of the "stabilization trap", the contribution that an
appropriate macroeconomic policy can make to poverty reduction and employment
creation, and more generally, the possibilities and limits of expansionary
macroeconomic policies.
It will also contribute to the analytical and policy discussion regarding
poverty-employment relationships, and will analyse, in particular, the
interactions between macroeconomic policy and labour market policies.
Further work will also contribute to related debates on development,
especially in showing the relationship between growth, employment and poverty.
|
|
|